Tell us about your firm and its situation. We analyze the market, three real competitors, and what makes you different, then deliver two focused action plans with specific moves and signals of success. A defensible plan, not a slideshow.
No credit card · Output in minutes when you run it yourself · 48 hours when we run it with you
Trusted by teams at
Lead a firm or a practice line and have a strategy meeting coming up
Need a defensible artifact partners will actually read, not a 30-slide deck
Want an outside view that respects what you already know about your business
Unique Ownable Territory: "The firm partners who've actually run companies, not just advised them."
What we'll do: Promote the practice to a named offering with its own page, partner-led case studies, and a quarterly point-of-view release. The work is happening already. The market doesn't know the firm does it, because the firm doesn't say so. Make it the second thing on the homepage.
One of two action plans. The full output adds the competitor overview, the Three Uniques, the four moves per plan, and a Strategic Action Plan on a Page.
"The plan named something the three partners had been avoiding for a year. We disagreed with one of the action plans and that was useful too. We left the meeting having made a decision, which is the part that usually doesn't happen."
We could write you a long pitch. Or we could let you run one for free and see for yourself. We picked the second one.
No. A strategy consultant runs interviews, builds a custom framework, and bills for six weeks. Savvier gives you a structured strategic read in minutes, grounded in your inputs and your category. It's a real artifact to react to, often the thing that makes a follow-up consultant engagement more productive.
The workflow uses public information about three competitors you specify. If a competitor's positioning is unclear, the workflow says so. If a gap you'd assumed isn't actually there, the workflow surfaces that. The point is a defensible read, not a flattering one.
Yes, but the input matters. A one-partner firm needs to be specific about the situation, the audience, and the competitors. The workflow doesn't know your business; it knows how to read it once you describe it. The thinner your input, the more generic the output.
They might not. The output is a planning artifact to react to, not a directive. The most useful version of this for many firms is the one where the partners read the plan together and say which parts they'd do differently. That conversation itself is the value.
Pick the path that fits. Both are free.